Legal Opinion
Stupp Corp. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided January 8, 2019No. Slip Op. 19-2; Consol. Court No. 15-00334PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Kelly, Judge:
This consolidated action is before the court on several motions for judgment on the agency record filed respectively by Stupp Corporation, a division of Stupp Bros., Inc., TMK IPSCO, and Welspun Tubular LLC USA (collectively "Stupp et al."), SeAH Steel Corporation ("SeAH"), and Maverick Tube Corporation ("Maverick").1 See Pls. [Stupp et al.'s] Mot. J.R.
*1297Pursuant Rule 56.2, July 5, 2016, ECF No. 39; Mot. Pl. SeAH [ ] J. Agency R., July 5, 2016, ECF No. 40; Pl.-Intervenor [Maverick]'s Rule 56.2 Mot. J. Agency R., July 5, 2016, ECF No. 41. These parties challenge various aspects of…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Ceramica Regiomontana, S.A. And Industrias Intercontinental, S.A. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Ceramica Regiomontanam, S.A. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1986
- Torrington Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Stupp Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2021
- Stupp Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2023
- Stupp Corporation v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2019
- Coal. of Am. Flange Producers v. United StatesPublic version posted 06/17/2020.United States Court of International Trade · 2020
- Goodluck India Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2019
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.