Legal Opinion
Torrington Co. v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided October 24, 1995No. Nos. 95-1134, 95-1135PublishedCited by 183 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRYSON, Circuit Judge.
These consolidated cases present two questions of statutory interpretation arising out of an administrative review of antidumping duty orders. The first question concerns what constitutes “good cause,” within the meaning of 19 U.S.C. § 1677e(b)(3)(B) (1988), to require the Commerce Department to verify the information it relied on in conducting the administrative review. The second question is whether the Commerce Department may lawfully reduce the potential antidump-ing duties on goods imported into this country by taking into account pre-sale transportation expenses…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Heckler v. ChaneySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Smith-Corona Group v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Koyo Seiko Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by183 opinions
- Nippon Steel Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- F.lli De Cecco di Filippo Fara S. Martino S.p.A. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
- Fujitsu General Limited v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Pesquera Mares Australes Ltda. v. United States v. Coalition for Fair Atlantic Salmon TradeCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- Ta Chen Stainless Steel Pipe, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
178 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.