Legal Opinion
Stupp Co. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided February 24, 2023No. Consol. 15-00334PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Slip Op. 23-23 UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE STUPP CORPORATION ET AL., Plaintiffs and Consolidated Plaintiffs, and MAVERICK TUBE CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Intervenor and Consolidated Plaintiff-Intervenor, Before: Claire R. Kelly, Judge v. Consol. Court No. 15-00334 UNITED STATES, Defendant, and SEAH STEEL CORPORATION AND HYUNDAI STEEL COMPANY, Defendant-Intervenors and Consolidated Defendant- Intervenors. OPINION AND ORDER [Sustaining the U.S. Department of Commerce’s third remand redetermination in the less-than-fair-value investigation of welded line pipe from the Republic of…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Camp v. PittsSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Axiom Resource Management, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
- Ceramica Regiomontana, S.A. And Industrias Intercontinental, S.A. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Ceramica Regiomontanam, S.A. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1986
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- HiSteel Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2023
- HiSteel Co. v. United StatesVacated: 09/12/2023.United States Court of International Trade · 2023
- NEXTEEL Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2023
- Resolute FP Canada Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2024