Legal Opinion
Stupp Corporation v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided March 7, 2019No. Consol. 15-00334PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Kelly, Judge:
Before the court is a motion for reconsideration filed by SeAH Steel Corporation ("SeAH") 1 pursuant to Rule 59(e) of the Rules of the U.S. Court of International Trade ("USCIT"). 2 See [SeAH's] Mot. [ ] Reconsideration Ct.'s Jan. 8, 2019 Order, Jan. 28, 2019, ECF No. 127 ("SeAH's Mot."). SeAH requests that the court reconsider its decision sustaining the U.S. Department of Commerce's ("Department" or "Commerce") application of its differential pricing analysis and revise Slip Opinion 19-2, dated January 8, 2019, accordingly. See Stupp Corp. v. United States , 43 CIT ----, ----,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Ceramica Regiomontana, S.A. And Industrias Intercontinental, S.A. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Ceramica Regiomontanam, S.A. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1986
- Yuba Natural Resources, Inc. v. The United States, Defendant/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Stupp Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2021
- Stupp Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2023
- Toyo Kohan Co., Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2026