Legal Opinion

Basye v. Hayes

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided February 9, 1938No. 6442PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGivens, J.

Respondents entered into a written agreement with appellant to manage and care for appellant’s poultry raneh and fox farm for certain compensation in money and goods. The only portion of the agreement in dispute herein is for one-half the net profits from the fox feature of the agreement.

Respondents recovered judgment for $277.38 as one-half the net profits from the increase of foxes. Appellants raise four issues: First, there were no net profits because the expenses exceeded the value of the foxes produced and, collaterally, error in admitting Plaintiff’s Exhibit C as not complete or…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Adams v. Bunker Hill & Sullivan Mining Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1906
  2. State v. SmithMontana Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Tennessee Central Railroad v. MorganTennessee Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Merchants Trust Co. v. HopkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  5. Radtke v. TaylorOregon Supreme Court · 1922

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Pittman v. SatherIdaho Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Williams v. HavensIdaho Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Bean v. Diamond Alkali CompanyIdaho Supreme Court · 1969
  4. John Scowcroft & Sons Co. v. RoselleIdaho Supreme Court · 1955
  5. IHC Hospitals, Inc. v. Board of CommissionersIdaho Supreme Court · 1985

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API