Legal Opinion

John Scowcroft & Sons Co. v. Roselle

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided November 1, 1955No. 8310PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PORTER, Justice.

Respondent brought this action to recover from appellant the balance due upon an open account for goods, wares and merchandise allegedly sold and delivered to appellant. At the close of respondent’s case appellant moved for a judgment of nonsuit upon the ground of the insufficiency of the evidence. The motion was denied. Appellant then rested his case. The jury rendered a verdict for respondent for $315.70, being the amount shown to be unpaid on the open account. Judgment was entered accordingly. Appellant has appealed to this court from such judgment.

The principal assignments…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. In Re Potlatch Forests, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Thornton v. BudgeIdaho Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Bevercombe v. Denney & Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1924
  4. State v. BaldwinIdaho Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Clark v. TarrIdaho Supreme Court · 1954

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Cheney v. Palos Verdes Investment Corp.Idaho Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Bailey v. NessIdaho Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Clark v. GneitingIdaho Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Clements v. JungertIdaho Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Robert Humphries v. Eileen BeckerIdaho Supreme Court · 2016

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API