Legal Opinion

Bean v. Diamond Alkali Company

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided May 12, 1969No. 10203PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McFADDEN, Chief Justice.

Respondent Gary Bean, a farmer residing near Filer, Idaho, has for a number of years in his farming operations raised onion seed. He instituted this action as plaintiff, alleging in his amended complaint a breach of warranty of a chemical compound applied to 4.8 acres of onions, causing him $3,100.00 damages in loss of crops. Appellant Diamond Alkali Company, a corporation, manufactured the chemical, which appellant Twin Falls Feed & Ice, Inc., sold to Bean. The case was tried before a jury which returned a verdict in favor of Bean. The two corporate defendants…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Smith v. Big Lost River Irrigation DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Ausmus v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1910
  3. Skaggs Drug Centers, Inc. v. City of Idaho FallsIdaho Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Davis v. Nelson-Deppe, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Hobbs v. Union Pacific R. R. Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1940

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. State v. DillonIdaho Supreme Court · 1970
  2. State v. WatsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Stoddard v. NelsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Henderson v. Cominco American, IncorporatedIdaho Supreme Court · 1973
  5. State v. CutlerIdaho Supreme Court · 1971

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API