Legal Opinion
Mechanics & Farmers Savings Bank v. Delco Development Co.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided April 11, 1995No. 15119; 15120PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Per curiam
The dispositive issues in this appeal are whether the trial court properly: (1) rejected the special defense of partial payment and satisfaction of a promissory note of the defendants Delco Development Company, Inc. (Delco), Gary R. Ginsberg and Robert A. Ginsburg (defendants)1; and (2) calculated the interest on the debt owed by the defendants. The defendants appealed to the Appellate Court from the trial court’s judgment of strict foreclosure, and we transferred the appeal to this court pursuant to Practice Book § 4023 and General Statutes § 51-199 (c). We affirm the judgment of the trial…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- D'Oench, Duhme & Co. v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Texaco, Inc. v. GolartSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Skrzypiec v. NoonanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Enquire Printing & Publishing Co. v. O'ReillySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- Greater Bridgeport Transit District v. State Board of Labor RelationsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. Napert-Boyer PartnershipConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
- Central Bank v. Colonial Romanelli AssociatesConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995
- Cadle Co. v. GinsburgConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998
- Cadle Co. v. GinsbergConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- Monument Realty v. Youmatz, No. Cv 0071092 (Feb. 18, 1997)Connecticut Superior Court · 1997
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.