Legal Opinion
Cadle Co. v. Ginsberg
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided July 9, 2002No. AC 21130PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*750 Opinion
BISHOP, J.
In this collection action to enforce a negotiable promissory note, the substitute plaintiff, CadleRock Joint Venture, L.P.,1 appeals from the judgment of the trial court rendered in favor of the defendant, Gary R. Ginsberg. The plaintiff claims that the court improperly (1) denied its motions to direct a verdict in its favor, to set aside the verdict for the defendant and to render judgment for the plaintiff notwithstanding the verdict, (2) charged the jury regarding the plaintiffs burden of proof on its status as a holder in due course, (3) submitted the construction of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Habetz v. CondonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Gagne v. VaccaroSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- Elm Street Builders, Inc. v. Enterprise Park Condominium Ass'nConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- American Heritage Agency, Inc. v. GelinasConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- Mechanics & Farmers Savings Bank v. Delco Development Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Hudson United Bank v. Cinnamon Ridge Corp.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- State v. LopezConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- Solano v. CalegariConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
- Blitz v. SubklewConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- Phillips v. PhillipsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.