Legal Opinion
Enquire Printing & Publishing Co. v. O'Reilly
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided June 12, 1984No. 11649PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtShea, J.
The principal issue raised in this appeal in an action for nonpayment for goods sold and delivered is whether the trial court erred in refusing to permit an attorney, licensed by another state, to be admitted pro hac vice when it was reasonably likely that the attorney would be called as a witness.
The defendants, Rev. John O’Reilly and The Contemporary Mission, appeal from a judgment following a jury verdict for the plaintiff, Enquire Printing Company, Inc., claiming that the court erred (1) in denying the application to have an out-of-state attorney admitted pro hac vice; (2) in dismissing…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Yick Wo v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. ButtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Schware v. Board of Bar Examiners of NMSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- In Re GriffithsSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- State v. WebbSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Matza v. MatzaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Burger & Burger, Inc. v. MurrenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- State v. GarySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- Herrmann v. Summer Plaza Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.