Legal Opinion
Federal Deposit Insurance v. Napert-Boyer Partnership
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided February 27, 1996No. 14230PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLavery, J.
This is an appeal by the defendants1 from a judgment on two promissory notes for $12,301,165.61. The notes called for a variable interest rate of 1 percent above the prime rate of Connecticut Bank and Trust Company (CBT). The defendants claim that the trial court improperly (1) substituted the prime rate of Fleet Financial Group for the prime rate of the failed CBT, (2) found that a prior foreclosed $1 million mortgage did not merge with the two notes in question and that General Statutes § 49-12 did not prevent the plaintiff from seeking a judgment on the mortgage debt, (3) found that the…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- D'Oench, Duhme & Co. v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- United States v. Kimbell Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Pandolphe's Auto Parts, Inc. v. Town of ManchesterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Linde Thomson Langworthy Kohn & Van Dyke, P.C. v. Resolution Trust CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1993
- State v. HammondSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Fidelity Bank v. KreniskyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- SKW Real Estate Ltd. Partnership v. GallicchioConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998
- Republic Credit Corp. I v. Boyer (In Re Boyer)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut · 2007
- Michael Rizzo and Louise Rizzo v. Pierce & AssociatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
- Shadhali, Inc. v. HintlianConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.