Legal Opinion
Texaco, Inc. v. Golart
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided March 8, 1988No. 13093PublishedCited by 53 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGlass, J.
The plaintiff, Texaco, Inc., brought an action against the defendants, Thomas J. Golart and Marion D. Golart, seeking specific performance of an option to purchase a parcel of real property located in Groton. The defendants asserted eight special defenses,1 and by their amended counterclaim sought damages, including punitive damages, attorney’s and expert fees and equitable relief. The trial court, Schaller, J., found for the plaintiff and ordered specific performance under the fixed price purchase option of the lease. The defendants now appeal, claiming that the trial court erred in: (1)…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Willard v. TayloeSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
- Breen v. PhelpsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Hamm v. TaylorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- United States Trust Co. v. BohartSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Cameron v. CameronSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- Cheshire Mortgage Service, Inc. v. MontesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Schoonmaker v. Lawrence Brunoli, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Connecticut National Bank v. VoogSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Gaudio v. GaudioConnecticut Appellate Court · 1990
- Commissioner of Environmental Protection v. Connecticut Building Wrecking Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.