Legal Opinion

Associated Indemnity Corp. v. Warner

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided July 28, 1983No. 1 CA-CIV 6011PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MEYERSON, Judge.

Appellants Jack and Fran Warner, who were being sued for damages to an airplane owned by a third party, sought coverage for the claim and defense of the suit from appellee Associated Indemnity Corporation (Associated), the company providing Warner’s automobile insurance coverage. Associated denied the claim and filed a declaratory judgment action to determine its liability under the policy. Cross motions for summary judgment were filed and the trial court granted judgment in favor of Associated. The Warners appeal from the entry of summary judgment against them.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Brenner v. Aetna Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1968
  2. Morari v. Atlantic Mutual Fire Insurance CompanyArizona Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. GranilloCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
  4. Plaxco v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1969
  5. Catalina Foothills Ass'n, Inc. v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1982

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Associated Indemnity Corp. v. WarnerArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  2. G & S INVESTMENTS v. BelmanCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
  3. Hunt Investment Co. v. EliotCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1987
  4. Scottsdale Memorial Health Systems, Inc. v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1990
  5. Salerno v. Atlantic Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API