Legal Opinion

G & S INVESTMENTS v. Belman

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided November 30, 1984No. 2 CA-CIV 4997PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HOWARD, Judge.

This case involves a partnership dispute arising out of the misconduct and subsequent death of Thomas N. Nordale. There are two principal issues in this case: whether the surviving general partner, G & 5 Investments, is entitled to continue the partnership after the death of Nordale, and how the value of Nordale’s interest in partnership property is to be computed. The trial court, after making findings of fact and conclusions of law, entered judgment in favor of G & S Investments, finding that it had the right to continue the partnership and that the estate was owed…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Schweiger v. China Doll Restaurant, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
  2. Woelke & Romero Framing, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Town of Chino Valley v. City of PrescottArizona Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Waugh v. LennardArizona Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Isaak v. Massachusetts Indemnity Life InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1981

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. State of Tennessee v. Noura JacksonTennessee Supreme Court · 2014
  2. St. Joseph's Hospital & Medical Center v. Reserve Life InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Velarde v. Pace Membership Warehouse, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
  4. Chandler Medical Building Partners v. Chandler Dental GroupCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1993
  5. Lunders v. Estate of SnyderIdaho Supreme Court · 1998

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API