Hunt Investment Co. v. Eliot
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GREER, Judge.
This appeal and cross-appeal raise questions concerning the award of costs and reasonable attorney’s fees to the plaintiff in a tax lien foreclosure action pursuant to A.R.S. § 42-454. The issues raised on appeal are:(1) Whether reimbursement of costs incurred by the plaintiff is limited to “taxable costs,” as set forth in A.R.S. § 12-322, and(2) Whether the trial court abused its discretion by reducing the amount of attorney’s fees requested by plaintiff.
The sole issue raised in the cross-appeal is whether the plaintiff was acting as his own counsel, therefore barring his…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Schwartz v. SchwerinArizona Supreme Court · 1959
- DeMontiney v. Desert Manor Convalescent Center Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1985
- Connor v. Cal-Az Properties, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
- Sweis v. ChatwinCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1978
- Bloch v. BentfieldCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- DeBry v. Cascade EnterprisesUtah Supreme Court · 1994
- Lisa v. StromCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1995
- Weinstein v. WeinsteinCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
- Munger Chadwick, P.L.C. v. Farwest Development & Construction of the Southwest, LLCCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
- Moedt v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.