Legal Opinion

Hunt Investment Co. v. Eliot

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided September 1, 1987No. 1 CA-CIV 9052PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GREER, Judge.

This appeal and cross-appeal raise questions concerning the award of costs and reasonable attorney’s fees to the plaintiff in a tax lien foreclosure action pursuant to A.R.S. § 42-454. The issues raised on appeal are:(1) Whether reimbursement of costs incurred by the plaintiff is limited to “taxable costs,” as set forth in A.R.S. § 12-322, and(2) Whether the trial court abused its discretion by reducing the amount of attorney’s fees requested by plaintiff.

The sole issue raised in the cross-appeal is whether the plaintiff was acting as his own counsel, therefore barring his…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Schwartz v. SchwerinArizona Supreme Court · 1959
  2. DeMontiney v. Desert Manor Convalescent Center Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Connor v. Cal-Az Properties, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
  4. Sweis v. ChatwinCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1978
  5. Bloch v. BentfieldCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. DeBry v. Cascade EnterprisesUtah Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Lisa v. StromCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1995
  3. Weinstein v. WeinsteinCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
  4. Munger Chadwick, P.L.C. v. Farwest Development & Construction of the Southwest, LLCCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
  5. Moedt v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2002

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API