Legal Opinion

Plaxco v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided March 24, 1969No. 18896PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Lewis, Justice.

The question to be decided in this case is whether the use by an insured of his automobile battery to crank the engine of his airplane,' by connecting the batteries of the two yehicles with “jumper cables,” constituted a use of the automobile within the meaning of an automobile liability insurance policy which provided coverage for damages “arising out of the ownership, maintenance or use of any automobile.” We have concluded that it did not.

The automobile liability policy involved was issued by the defendant, United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company, to the plaintiff, Lee…

2Cited by18 opinions

  1. Kangas v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. Wausau Underwriters Insurance v. HowserSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1992
  3. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1985
  4. General Insurance Co. of America v. Palmetto BankSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1977
  5. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance v. EvansCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1981

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API