Legal Opinion
Swiss Credit Bank v. Chemical Bank
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided October 20, 1976No. 73 Civ. 4701 (CHT)PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
TENNEY, District Judge.
Plaintiff, Swiss Credit Bank (“Swiss Credit”), moves for summary judgment, pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure on the grounds that under Sections 3-404 and 3-406 of the New York Uniform Commercial Code (“N.Y.U.C.C.” or the “Code”) defendant Chemical Bank is precluded from denying its forged endorsements on three promissory notes, the subject matter of this suit. In the alternative, Swiss Credit moves for summary judgment on the ground of an alleged constructive fraud.
The following facts are not in dispute. The three promissory notes…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- National Safe Deposit, Sav. & Trust Co. of DC v. HibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Sterling National Bank and Trust Co. Of New York v. Fidelity Mortgage InvestorsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- Bunge Corp. v. Manufacturers Hanover Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1972
- Brown v. People's National BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
- West Penn Administration, Inc. v. Union National Bank of PittsburghSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Bank of Hoven v. RauschSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
- Citicorp International Trading Co. v. Western Oil & Refining Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1992
- Lund v. Chemical BankDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1992
- Broward Title Co. v. Jacobs (In Re Apponline.com, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 2002
- Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. v. St. Louis (In Re Apponline.com, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 2003
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.