Legal Opinion

McNall v. Tatham

District Court, C.D. California

Decided December 23, 1987No. CV 85-2744 WJRPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AMENDED ORDER

REA, District Judge.

This matter comes before the Court on the motions of defendants Thomas Tatham and Naji Robert Nahas for summary adjudication pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The Court having considered the papers filed in support thereof and in opposition thereto and having heard oral argument,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motions are GRANTED in part and DENIED in part.

The Court finds as follows:

I. FACTS

This case arises from a course of dealing between Bruce McNall, Naji Robert Nahas and Thomas Tatham that involved at various times movie-making,…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. T.W. Electrical Service, Inc. v. Pacific Electrical Contractors AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  3. Hurtado v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Reich v. PurcellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Bernhard v. Harrah's ClubCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Dornberger v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1997
  2. Fioretti v. Massachusetts General Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API