Legal Opinion

John E. FERGUSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. the FLYING TIGER LINE, INC., Defendant-Appellee

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 1, 1982No. 80-5580PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

REINHARDT, Circuit Judge:

Plaintiff appeals from the judgment and order of the district court, 491 F.Supp. 1348, granting defendant’s motion for summary judgment. We reverse.

Plaintiff is a black male who unsuccessfully sought employment as a flight engineer with defendant, Flying Tiger Line, Inc. Plaintiff filed a charge with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) in June 1974, alleging that he was denied employment due to his race. In settlement of this charge, a Pre-Determination Settlement Agreement [Agreement] was entered into by plaintiff and defendant. The Agreement was…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Parsons v. Bristol Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1965
  4. William Radobenko and Mary G. Radobenko, His Wife, Individually and as Husband and Wife v. Automated Equipment Corporation, a California CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
  5. Branch v. Virginia Employment Commission & Virginia Chemical Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1978

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Edward Ashton v. Kenneth CoryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  2. Diane MILLER and Pamela Lewis, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. FAIRCHILD INDUSTRIES, INC., a Maryland Corporation, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  3. Miller v. Fairchild Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  4. The Estate of Kenneth Wenzel by Its Special Administrator Winston Mirikitani, Edward Wenzel and Anna M. Steinberg v. Seaward Marine Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
  5. George Deukmejian, Attorney General of the State of California v. United States Postal ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API