Legal Opinion
Boudreau v. Baughman
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided June 2, 1988No. 409PA87Published
1Opinion of the Court
368 S.E.2d 849 (1988)
Herbert Dean BOUDREAU
v.
Milo BAUGHMAN and Milo Baughman Design, Inc.
No. 409PA87.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
June 2, 1988.
Faison, Brown, Fletcher & Brough by O. William Faison, Timothy C. Barber and Gary R. Poole, Durham, for plaintiff-appellant.
Hutchins, Tyndall, Doughton & Moore by Richard Tyndall and H. Lee Davis, Jr., Winston-Salem, for defendants-appellees.
MARTIN, Justice.
The sole issue for review on this appeal is whether the trial court properly granted defendants' motion for summary judgment. As a preliminary matter, however, this case poses a choice of law…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited89 opinions
- Arnold G. Barwick v. The Celotex Corporation, Keene Corporation, Pittsburgh Corning Corporation, H.K. Porter, Forty-Eight Insulations, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1984
- Dickens v. PuryearSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- West v. Caterpillar Tractor Company, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1976
- Boudreau v. BaughmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
- Rosenberg v. Town of North BergenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1972
84 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.