Legal Opinion
Oberwise v. Poulos
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 11, 1932No. Docket No. 8302PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DOOLING, J., pro tem.
This is an appeal by plaintiff from a judgment denying him injunctive relief by enjoining the defendants Carey Smith and Lillie B. Smith, his wife, who are persons of negro blood, from occupying a certain lot of land of which they are the owners, and which they • acquired from the defendants Poulos. The action is based upon ten separate instruments, all of which are in identical language and read as follows:
“Covenants of Restriction.
“This Agreement, made and entered into this - day of October, 1925.
“Witnesseth, that in consideration of the mutual covenants herein…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Werner v. GrahamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Green v. SkinnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Chuck v. Quan Wo Chong & Co.California Supreme Court · 1891
- Pepin v. StricklinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- Tilden v. TildenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Stark v. CokerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Fairchild v. RainesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Swartzbaugh v. SampsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
- Sullivan's Estate v. Commissioner of Internal Rev.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1949
- Disney v. DisneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.