Legal Opinion

Tilden v. Tilden

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 1, 1927No. Docket No. 4590PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConrey, P. J.

Plaintiff is the wife of defendant B. E. Tilden. Defendant S. D. Tilden is a son of B. E. Tilden by a former marriage. Plaintiff brought this action to quiet title to several parcels of real property in Los Angeles County. The several parcels are described in the complaint. The plaintiff alleged that she is the owner of twenty described lots in block 60 of the city of Santa Monica; that she is the owner of the south 155 feet of the east 173 feet of block 1 of Colegrove, in the city of Los Angeles; that she is the owner of lots 6 and 7 in block “E” of tract 342 in Los Angeles County; that she…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gilmour v. North Pasadena Land Etc. Co.California Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Green v. SkinnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Potter v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
  4. Hilborn v. SoaleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Huber v. HuberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Estate of HarrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Hammond v. McArthurCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Randall v. Department of InstitutionsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Pepin v. StricklinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API