Chuck v. Quan Wo Chong & Co.
California Supreme Court
Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco denying a new trial, from an order made after final judgment refusing to vacate and set aside the judgment, from an order made after final judgment refusing to restore the defendant to possession of the premises in controversy, and from an order made after final judgment refusing to strike out the plaintiff’s cost-bill. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtPaterson, J.
This is an action of unlawful detainer. It is the same case as No. 13088, decision this day filed (ante, p. 592); but the appeal herein is from an order denying the defendant’s motion for a new trial, from an order made after final judgment denying the defendant’s motion to vacate and set asidethe judgment from which an appeal was taken in No. 13088, and from an order refusing defendant’s motion to strike out the plaintiff’s cost-bill.
The last two orders referred to are non-appealable. The appeal therefrom is therefore dismissed. (Eureka etc. R. R. Co. v. McGrath, 74 Cal. 49.)
It is claimed by…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Stoppelkamp v. MangeotCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
- Eureka & Trinidad Railroad v. McGrathCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Muller v. BoggsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
- Canning v. FibushCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- McLaren v. HutchinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1861
3Cited by23 opinions
- Tompkins v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- Swartzbaugh v. SampsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
- Prairie Oil & Gas Co. v. AllenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1924
- Atlantic Oil Co. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Johnston v. DelayNevada Supreme Court · 1945
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.