Pepin v. Stricklin
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
DOOLING, J., pro tem.
This is an appeal on the judgment-roll alone. Plaintiff and appellant sued to quiet title to two parcels of land. The court found that for a long time prior to June 27, 1923, plaintiff and her husband, the defendant Albert Pepin, had been living separate and apart; that on June 27, 1923, plaintiff entered into two separate contracts with the Bank of Italy to purchase the parcels of land in question; that all payments made by plaintiff upon said contracts were made from her separate earnings; that plaintiff caused said contracts to be issued in the name of herself and said…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Riley v. MartinelliCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Tilden v. TildenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
- Calkins v. SteinbachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
- Pacific Fruit Exchange v. SchropferCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
3Cited by23 opinions
- Rauer's Collection Co. v. HigginsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- Zeigler v. BonnellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- Hammond v. McArthurCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Oberwise v. PoulosCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- Grothe v. Cortlandt Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1992
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.