Legal Opinion

Beal v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided July 10, 1986No. 1 CA-CIV 8191, 1 CA-CIV 8223PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JACOBSON, Presiding Judge.

These are consolidated appeals by the defendants in a personal injury action, and their insurer, from a formal order denying their motions to set aside a default and default judgment.

The issues presented for our consideration are: (1) whether the trial court abused its discretion in refusing to vacate the default judgment pursuant to Rule 60(c)(1), Arizona Rules of Civil Procedure, on the ground that defendants Iddings’ failure to timely answer plaintiff Thomas Beal’s com-. plaint was excusable neglect; (2) whether the trial court abused its discretion in refusing to…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Daou v. HarrisArizona Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Sandoval v. ChenowethArizona Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Richas v. SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA, ETC.Arizona Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Webb v. EricksonArizona Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Hirsch v. National Van Lines, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1983

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Mohave Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. ByersCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1997
  2. Maher v. UrmanCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2005
  3. STATE DES v. ValentineCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1997
  4. Baker International Associates, Inc. v. Shanwick International Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1993
  5. Holt v. Utica Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1987

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API