Legal Opinion
STATE DES v. Valentine
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided October 28, 1997No. 1 CA-CV 96-0305PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GRANT, Judge.
Lenny Valentine (“Respondent”) appeals from the trial court’s denial of his Motion for Reconsideration and Motion to Set Aside Judgment. For the reasons that follow, we reverse and remand.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
This appeal arises from a paternity judgment and order entered in an action by the State of Arizona (the “state”), through its Department of Economic Security (“D.E.S.”), filed in 1994 to establish paternity of Lisa Schwoegler’s (the biological mother) child who was born in January 1989.
A blood test pursuant to the state’s motion and order demonstrated…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Webb v. EricksonArizona Supreme Court · 1982
- Visco v. Universal Refuse Removal CompanyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969
- Edsall v. SUPER. CT. IN & FOR COUNTY OF PIMAArizona Supreme Court · 1984
- Lewis v. OliverCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1993
- Dykeman v. AshtonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1968
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Braillard v. Maricopa CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
- St. Claire v. St. ClaireNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
- Roberto F. v. Arizona Department of Economic SecurityCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2013
- Reesler v. K.C.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
- JOHN C. v. SargeantCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.