Legal Opinion

Holt v. Utica Mutual Insurance

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided June 2, 1987No. 1 CA-CIV 8927PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GREER, Judge.

This litigation involves garnishment proceedings in which a judgment creditor sought the proceeds of an errors and omissions policy issued to an insurance broker. The primary issue on appeal is whether Sandoval v. Chenoweth, 102 Ariz. 241, 428 P.2d 98 (1967) precludes the insurer from defending against the creditor on grounds that the insured breached his duty to cooperate with the insurer by defaulting in the underlying lawsuit.

William G. Holt paid premiums to Vince Anderson, an insurance agent, to purchase policies of liability insurance on his vehicles. On April 14,…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Wagenseller v. Scottsdale Memorial HospitalArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Schweiger v. China Doll Restaurant, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
  3. Ford v. Revlon, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Arizona Property & Casualty Insurance Guaranty Fund v. HelmeArizona Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Sandoval v. ChenowethArizona Supreme Court · 1967

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. PeatonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1990
  2. Holt v. Utica Mutual InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API