Legal Opinion

Public Utilities Commission v. City of Loveland

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided June 23, 1930No. 12,254PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Campbell

Although this writ of error is entitled the Public Utilities Commission of the state of Colorado, and Otto Bock, Dan S. Jones and Worth Allen, commissioners constituting said commission, as plaintiffs in error, against the city of Loveland, Colorado, a municipal corporation, as defendant in error, the real controversy is between the city, a municipal corporation, and the Public Service Company, a private corporation — both public utilities, however, under our pertinent statutes — each of which claims the exclusive franchise and right to furnish and serve a certain territory adjacent to, and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Interstate Commerce Commission v. Union Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. Greeley Transportation Co. v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1926
  3. Bulger v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1916
  4. Clark v. Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1925
  5. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1920

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. State Board of Dental Examiners v. SavelleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1932
  2. Consolidated Freightways Corp. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1965
  3. City & County of Denver v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1973
  4. Western Colorado Power Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1966
  5. Public Service Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1960

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API