Legal Opinion

Clark v. Utilities Commission

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided July 6, 1925No. 11,276PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Burke

Respondents were plaintiffs and petitioners were defendants before the Public Utilities Commission and for convenience we hereinafter so refer to them. Plaintiffs Lannon, Bock and Jones are the members of the Public Utilities Commission of Colorado (hereinafter called the commission), and plaintiffs the Denver and Interurban Railroad Company, Colorado and Southern Railway Company and the Union Pacific Railroad Company are common carriers operating railway lines between Denver and Boulder, Colorado.

The plaintiff companies brought this action against defendants to prohibit their alleged…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Wheeler v. Northern Colorado Irrigation Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1886
  2. People v. Colorado Title & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1918
  3. Ex parte Batesville & Brinkley RailroadSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1882
  4. City of Brownsville v. BasseTexas Supreme Court · 1875
  5. Hubbell v. McCourtWisconsin Supreme Court · 1878

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. North Bend Stage Line, Inc. v. Department of Public WorksWashington Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Greeley Transportation Co. v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1926
  3. Public Utilities Commission v. City of LovelandSupreme Court of Colorado · 1930
  4. Garcia v. District CourtSupreme Court of Colorado · 1965
  5. Shore v. District CourtSupreme Court of Colorado · 1953

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API