Legal Opinion

Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Public Utilities Commission

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided January 15, 1920No. 9150PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Denison

Certain shippers brought suit before the Public Utilities Commission to reform the switching rates in the Denver Railway Yards. The Commission reduced the rates and the Railway Companies seek to review that order under section 52 of the Act of 1913; S. L. 1913, pp. 497-498.

Under that section “the findings and conclusions of the 'commission on disputed questions of fact” are “not'subject to review,” but since the same section permits us, among other things, to determine “whether the order of the corn-fission is just and reasonable and whether its conclusions are in accordance with the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Steenerson v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
  2. City & County of Denver v. Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1919
  3. Kindel v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1914

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. McKay v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1939
  2. Ephraim Freightways, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1963
  3. Public Utilities Commission v. City of LovelandSupreme Court of Colorado · 1930
  4. City of Fort Collins v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1921
  5. Spears v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1937

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API