Legal Opinion
State v. Hoffman
Utah Supreme Court
Decided December 28, 1976No. 14198PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DON V. TIBBS, District Judge.
The defendant, Wendell H. Hoffman, seeks a reversal of his conviction on two counts of practicing medicine without a license, in violation of Utah Code Annotated, Section 58-12-30 (1953) as amended.
We affirm the conviction.
The Utah Department of Business Regulation received information the appellant was practicing medicine without a license. Agents were sent as patients, using assumed names, to obtain what purported to be medical treatment from appellant.
On August 9, 1974, after making an appointment with appellant, agents Linda Lambert and Scott Helm visited…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Branzburg v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Hurtado v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Ferguson v. SkrupaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Beck v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Maxwell v. DowSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Vance v. FordhamUtah Supreme Court · 1983
- People v. RogersMichigan Court of Appeals · 2002
- State v. HoffmanUtah Supreme Court · 1987
- Carbaugh v. Asbestos Corporation LimitedUtah Supreme Court · 2007
- Vance v. FordhamUtah Supreme Court · 1983