Legal Opinion

Beck v. Washington

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 25, 1962No. 40PublishedCited by 575 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Clark

Petitioner David D. Beck contends that his conviction of grand larceny in the Superior Court of the State of Washington for King County is invalid under the Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment. This contention is based primarily on what is characterized as voluminous and continuous adverse publicity circulated by news media in the vicinity of Seattle, Washington, where he was indicted and tried. Specifically he claims, inter alia, that the grand jury was unfairly impaneled and instructed, that the prosecutor acted improperly before the grand jury, and that his…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Irvin v. DowdSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Costello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  3. Hoffman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  4. Hurtado v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  5. Lawn v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by575 opinions

  1. Albright v. OliverSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Gerstein v. PughSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Engle v. IsaacSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Nebraska Press Assn. v. StuartSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Murphy v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

570 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API