Legal Opinion
Vance v. Fordham
Utah Supreme Court
Decided August 22, 1983No. 18176Published
1Opinion of the Court
671 P.2d 124 (1983)
Robert B. VANCE, D.O., Plaintiff and Appellant,
v.
Paul T. FORDHAM, Director of the Department of Registration; Department of Registration, State of Utah and the Osteopathic Committee, Defendants and Respondents.
No. 18176.
Supreme Court of Utah.
August 22, 1983.
M. Richard Walker, Salt Lake City, for plaintiff and appellant.
David L. Wilkinson, Atty. Gen., Steven G. Schwendiman, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salt Lake City, for defendants and respondents.
OAKS, Justice:
Appellant, an osteopathic physician, had his license revoked by respondent, Director of the Department of Registration. The…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Schware v. Board of Bar Examiners of NMSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- State v. CarrollSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1871
- Megdal v. Oregon State Board of Dental ExaminersOregon Supreme Court · 1980
- In Re Redevelopment Plan for Bunker Hill v. GoldmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
- Utah Department of Administrative Services v. Public Service CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1983
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.