Legal Opinion

Forsling v. Mickelson

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 30, 1938No. File No. 8154PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPo'Leey, J.

Action to recover damages for injuries resulting from an automobile wreck.

The evidence shows substantially the following facts: For several years prior to 1936, the business men of the city of 'Canton had made a practice of annually holding what was known as a “Corn Carnival,” composed of such various games and amusements as generally accompany a street carnival; the purpose being to assemble as large a crowd in the city as possible in order to promote the good will of the people in the surrounding territory and thereby increase trade and business in the city. The business men of the city had…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Naudzius v. LahrMichigan Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Melby v. AndersonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Bobich v. RogersMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Willett v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Finkler v. ZimmerMichigan Supreme Court · 1932

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Kruzie v. SandersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Peters v. HoisingtonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Thuente v. Hart MotorsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1944
  4. Blair v. GreeneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1945
  5. Jennings v. HodgesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1964

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API