Legal Opinion

Willett v. Smith

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 16, 1932No. Docket No. 107, Calendar No. 36,183PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClark, C. J.

Plaintiff, a child of seven years, sues by her next friend for damages for personal injuries suffered in an accident while she was a gratuitous guest in the automobile of defendant Smith. Judgment for defendant, notwithstanding the verdict, was entered by order of the court, and this presents the only question in the case, appealed by plaintiff, which is: Was there any evidence of so-called gross negligence or of wilfulness or wantonness of defendant to permit recovery under the guest statute, 1 Comp. Laws 1929, § 4648 (Act No. 19, Pub. Acts 1929), no recovery being permitted by the statute…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Naudzius v. LahrMichigan Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Gibbard v. CursanMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Bobich v. RogersMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Finkler v. ZimmerMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Union Trust Co. v. Detroit, Grand Haven & Milwaukee Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1927

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Melby v. AndersonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1936
  2. LaCroix v. Grand Trunk Western RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Davidson v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1943
  4. McLone v. BeanMichigan Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Titus v. LonerganMichigan Supreme Court · 1948

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API