Legal Opinion

Peters v. Hoisington

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 23, 1949No. File No. 8994PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRoberts, J.

Plaintiff brought this. action to recover damages for personal injuries sustained in an automobile accident. Harley Hoisington, driver of the automobile, and Harley H. Hoisington, its owner, are named as defendants. At the conclusion of all the testimony defendants moved separately for directed verdicts. The motion of the owner of the automobile was granted. The cause was submitted to the jury as against the other defendant and a verdict in the sum of $7,375 was returned in favor of the plaintiff. Motion for judgment n. o. v. was denied. Judgment was rendered on the verdict and this appeal…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. WILCOX v. the Executors of PlummerSupreme Court of the United States · 1830
  2. Scotvold v. ScotvoldSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Miller v. StevensSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Leonard v. North Dakota Co-Operative Wool Marketing Ass'nNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Jensen v. JuulSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1938

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. Schiller v. RiceTexas Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Antonen v. SwansonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Jahnig v. CoismanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
  4. City of Sioux Falls v. KelleySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Degen v. BaymanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1976

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API