Blair v. Greene
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
Charlton was chief engineer and in charge of the crew, with complete supervision. Responsibility of accomplishing the work was on him, and Blair was aware of what he was doing. The mere use by him of the automobile belonging to Blair is presumptive evidence of use by right of authority, particularly so when it was shown that he was using it in the interest of his employer. Toranto v. Hattaway, 219 Ala. 520, 122 So. 816; Mobile P. M. Co. v. Coleman, 26 Ala. App. 402, 161 So. 826; Id., 230 Ala. 432,161 So. 829; Ackerson v. Erwin M. Jennings Co.,107 Conn. 393, 140 A. 760, 56 A.L.R. 1127. Our…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- McCann v. HoffmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
- Tidwell v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1881
- Kruy v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1929
- Nesbitt v. Twin City Forge & Foundry Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
- Hart v. HoganWashington Supreme Court · 1933
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Ex Parte AndersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1996
- Wooten v. RodenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1954
- Tolbert v. TolbertSupreme Court of Alabama · 2004
- Wagnon v. PattersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1954
- ROE BY AND THROUGH ROE v. LewisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1982
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.