Legal Opinion

State v. Phillips

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided January 24, 1989No. 2532PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Connell, J.

The defendant was convicted, after a jury trial, of sexual assault in the first degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-70, unlawful restraint in the first degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-95 and burglary in the first degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-101 (a) (2).1 He appeals only from the burglary conviction claiming that the trial court’s jury instruction misdefined “bodily injury” and thus permitted the jury to convict him on a nonstatutory theory of criminal liability. We find no error.

The jury could reasonably have found the following facts. On September…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. MastropetreSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
  2. State v. MilumSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
  3. State v. GrantConnecticut Appellate Court · 1986
  4. State v. LopezConnecticut Appellate Court · 1985
  5. State v. GreeneConnecticut Appellate Court · 1987

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Phillips v. WardenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  2. State v. ClarkConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998
  3. State v. HendersonConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995
  4. State v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
  5. State v. ColemanConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API