Legal Opinion
State v. Lopez
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided December 17, 1985No. 2187; 2188PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHull, J.
In this case, two defendants who were tried together appeal from their convictions arising out of the same factual background. Their cases were also combined on appeal. Each defendant was convicted, after a jury trial, of possession of burglar’s tools in violation of General Statutes § 53a-106, of burglary in the third degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-103, of larceny in the sixth degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-125b, and of conspiracy to commit burglary in violation of General Statutes § 53a-48.
Both defendants claim as error that the trial court improperly…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- State v. EvansSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
- Corbitt v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- State v. AshermanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- State v. KurvinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- State v. NardiniSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- State v. HillSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- State v. AvisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- State v. FarrarConnecticut Appellate Court · 1986
- State v. GrantConnecticut Appellate Court · 1986
- State v. RuparSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.