Legal Opinion
State v. Clark
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided June 2, 1998No. AC 15715PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
LANDAU, J.
The defendant, Daniel Clark, appeals from the judgment of conviction, following a jury trial, of burglary in the first degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-101 (a) (2)1 and sexual assault in the third degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-72a (a) (1) (A). On appeal, the defendant claims that (1) the trial court (a) abused its discretion with respect to eviden-tiary rulings and (b) improperly charged the jury, (2) the state failed to present evidence sufficient to convict the defendant of burglary in the first degree and (3) his federal and state…
2Cases cited73 opinions
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- State v. EvansSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- State v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- State v. MalaveSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- State v. RiveraConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- State v. O'neilConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- State v. BanksConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.