Legal Opinion
State v. Milum
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided November 19, 1985No. 11251PublishedCited by 73 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtArthur H. Healey, J.
The defendant, Ronald J. Milum, was convicted by a jury of the crimes of assault in the second degree; General Statutes § 53a-60; and unlawful restraint in the second degree. General Statutes § 53a-96.1 On appeal, the defendant claims that *604the trial court erred in: (1) denying the defendant the right to cross-examine the complaining witness to show bias, motive, prejudice and interest arising out of her having instituted a civil action against him for money damages based on the same circumstances as the present crimes and arising out of the fact that she had sought $25,000 in exchange for her…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Douglas v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- United States v. AugenblickSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- State v. HatchettTennessee Supreme Court · 1978
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by73 opinions
- State v. ColtonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- State v. PollittSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- State v. SantangeloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- State v. KellySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- State v. MilnerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.