Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. City of Jefferson v. Smith

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided September 25, 1941PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGantt, C. J.

Original action in mandamus. The City of Jefferson seeks to compel the State Auditor to register certain bonds. The' case is submitted on the pleadings. The Auditor contends that the bonds are invalid under Sec. 3, Art. X of the Constitution, which provides that “taxes may be levied and collected for (municipal) public purposes only. ’ ’ The rule is stated as follows:

“If the dominating motive for the erection of the hall is a strictly public use, then the expenditure for it is legal, although incidentally it may be devoted occasionally to uses that are not public. If, however, the project of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Detroit & Howell Railroad v. Township BoardMichigan Supreme Court · 1870
  2. Dysart v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1928
  3. State ex rel. Garth v. SwitzlerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1898
  4. Wheelock v. City of LowellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
  5. State Ex Inf. McKittrick v. MurphySupreme Court of Missouri · 1941

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Baker v. MathesonUtah Supreme Court · 1979
  2. St. Louis County v. River Bend Estates Homeowners' Ass'nSupreme Court of Missouri · 2013
  3. State Ex Rel. Mitchell v. City of SikestonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1977
  4. Holiday Island Suburban Improvement District 1 v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
  5. Curchin v. Missouri Industrial Development BoardSupreme Court of Missouri · 1987

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API