Legal Opinion
Baker v. Matheson
Utah Supreme Court
Decided December 28, 1979No. 16703PublishedCited by 49 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STEWART, Justice:
The issue raised on this appeal is the constitutionality of § 59-26-1 (the “Act”)1 which provides for a refund to certain renters and homeowners residing in the State of Utah of funds from the State’s general fund. The State Treasurer, Linn C. Baker (“plaintiff”), brought the action to test the constitutionality of the Act. The named defendants are the Governor of the State of Utah, Scott M. Matheson, and the Commissioners of the State Tax Commission (“defendants”). Miles “Cap” Ferry, President of the Utah State Senate, and James V. Hansen, Speaker of the Utah State House of…
2Cases cited59 opinions
- Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Shapiro v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Weinberger v. SalfiSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- Malan v. LewisUtah Supreme Court · 1984
- Blue Cross and Blue Shield v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 1989
- Lee v. GaufinUtah Supreme Court · 1993
- Wells v. Children's Aid Soc. of UtahUtah Supreme Court · 1984
- Mountain Fuel Supply Co. v. Salt Lake City Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1988
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.