Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Mitchell v. City of Sikeston

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided September 12, 1977No. 59963PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BARDGETT, Judge.

This is an original proceeding in the nature of quo warranto brought by the rela-tors, Charles M. Mitchell and Don C. Diven, resident taxpayers and ratepaying users of the municipal electric systems of Sikeston and Trenton, Missouri, respectively. They were authorized to bring this action on behalf of the state by the attorney general. Relators instituted this action against respondents city of Sikeston and city of Trenton, both municipal corporations organized and existing as cities of the third class under the laws of the state of Missouri. Jurisdiction is in this court…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Puget Sound Power & Light Co. v. SeattleSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. State Ex Rel. Thomson v. GiesselWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
  3. People Ex Rel. City of Salem v. McMackinIllinois Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Bowman v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1950
  5. Dysart v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1928

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Cape Motor Lodge, Inc. v. City of Cape GirardeauSupreme Court of Missouri · 1986
  2. Menorah Medical Center v. Health & Educational Facilities AuthoritySupreme Court of Missouri · 1979
  3. State Ex Rel. Jardon v. Industrial Development AuthoritySupreme Court of Missouri · 1978
  4. State Ex Rel. Wagner v. St. Louis County Port AuthoritySupreme Court of Missouri · 1980
  5. StopAquila. Org v. City of PeculiarSupreme Court of Missouri · 2006

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API