Legal Opinion
Holiday Island Suburban Improvement District 1 v. Williams
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided May 9, 1988No. 88-61PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Steele Hays, Justice.
The issue is whether the facilities of the Holiday Island Suburban Improvement District are exempted from general property taxes under Article 16 of the Arkansas Constitution. The trial court held that while some of the facilities were exempt, some were not, and the District has appealed from the adverse ruling. There is no.cross-appeal. We affirm the decree.
The District, Holiday Island Improvement District No. 1 of Carroll County, Arkansas, was formed in 1970 pursuant to Ark. Code Ann. §§ 14-92-201 et seq. (1987) [Ark. Stat. Ann. §§ 20-701 et seq. (Supp. 198 5)]. The…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Hogue v. the Housing Auth. of North Little RockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1940
- United Community Services v. Omaha National BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1956
- Briggs v. City of RaleighSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
- City of Glendale v. WhiteArizona Supreme Court · 1948
- Platte Valley Public Power & Irrigation District v. County of LincolnNebraska Supreme Court · 1944
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- City of Fayetteville v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
- City of Little Rock v. McIntoshSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
- Crittenden Hosp. Ass'n v. BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, CRITTENDEN CTY.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
- City of North Little Rock v. Pulaski CountySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
- SunN Lake of Sebring Dist. v. McIntyreDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.