Legal Opinion
SECURITY FIRST NAT. BANK OF LA v. Rospaw
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 1, 1951No. Civ. 4179PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGriffin, J.
Plaintiff and respondent, as executor of the estate of Minnie Beal Miller, deceased, brought this action against defendants and appellants Frank Rospaw and wife to recover on a written promissory note dated April 3, 1945, for the principal sum of $3,000, payable in payments of $35 or more on the 3d of every month, with interest from that date until paid at the rate of 6 per cent per annum.
Plaintiff alleges in paragraph I of the complaint that Mrs. Miller died February 21, 1949, and that respondent bank was duly appointed executor. Paragraph II sets up a copy of the note, alleges its delivery…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Lee v. HensleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
- P. A. Smith Co. v. MullerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- B. & W. Engineering Co. v. BeamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
- Overton v. WhiteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
- People v. LionbergerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Perdue v. Crocker National BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Roemer v. Retail Credit Co.California Court of Appeal · 1975
- Moving Picture MacHine Operators Union Local No. 162 v. Glasgow Theaters, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1970
- IMO Development Corp. v. Dow Corning Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1982
- Cadigan v. American Trust Co.California Court of Appeal · 1955
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.