People v. Kargol
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Per curiam
Two formal complaints were filed charging the respondent in this attorney disciplinary proceeding with appearing as counsel of record in numerous court proceedings after being suspended from the practice of law pursuant to C.R.C.P. 260.6(10). A hearing board found that the respondent had violated the Code of Professional Responsibility and the Rules of Procedure Regarding Lawyer Discipline as charged, and recommended that he be suspended for ninety days and that certain conditions on reinstatement be imposed. A hearing panel of the Supreme Court Grievance Committee approved the board’s…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- People v. JamesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
- Matter of ArrickArizona Supreme Court · 1994
- People v. DriscollSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
3Cited by10 opinions
- Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. LauHawaii Supreme Court · 1995
- People v. ZimmermannSupreme Court of Colorado · 1998
- People v. RiversSupreme Court of Colorado · 1997
- People v. ClarkSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
- People v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1997
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.