Legal Opinion

People v. Driscoll

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided June 1, 1992No. 92SA30PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

In this attorney disciplinary proceeding, a hearing panel of the Supreme Court Grievance Committee approved the findings of the hearing board and recommended that the respondent, Robert Justin Driscoll, be suspended from the practice of law for three years, be ordered to pay restitution, and be assessed the costs of these proceedings. Neither the assistant disciplinary counsel nor the respondent has excepted to the recommendation. We accept the hearing panel’s recommendation.

I

The respondent was admitted to the bar of this court on October 16, 1974, and is registered as an attorney upon this…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. MargolinSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
  2. People v. DriscollSupreme Court of Colorado · 1986
  3. People v. LambersonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1990

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. KargolSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
  2. People v. HoltSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
  3. Driscoll v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API