Legal Opinion

People v. Zimmermann

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided May 26, 1998No. 98SA113PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Per curiam

The assistant disciplinary counsel and the respondent in this lawyer discipline ease executed a stipulation, agreement, and conditional admission of misconduct pursuant to C.R.C.P. 241.18. In the conditional admission, the respondent consented to a three-year suspension or disbarment. An inquiry panel of the supreme court grievance committee approved the conditional admission and recommended that the respondent be disbarred. We accept the conditional admission and order that the respondent be disbarred.

I

The respondent was admitted to practice law in Colorado in 1971. On May 20, 1996, he was…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. People v. JamesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
  2. People v. RedmanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
  3. People v. WilsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
  4. People v. RossSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
  5. People v. ZimmermannSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. People v. RighterSupreme Court of Colorado · 1999
  2. People v. KolhouseSupreme Court of Colorado · 2013
  3. People v. CorbinSupreme Court of Colorado · 2003
  4. People v. MasonSupreme Court of Colorado · 2009
  5. People v. DugganSupreme Court of Colorado · 2012

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API