Legal Opinion

People v. Rivers

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided February 18, 1997No. 96SA432PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

A hearing panel of the supreme court grievance committee approved the findings and recommendations of a hearing board that the respondent in this lawyer discipline proceeding be suspended for one year and one day and be required to make certain restitution as a condition of reinstatement. Neither the respondent nor the deputy disciplinary counsel has excepted to the panel’s action. We accept the panel’s recommendation.

I

The respondent was admitted to practice law in Colorado in 1987. The respondent’s answer admitted the misconduct alleged in the complaint. Based on the answer and the evidence…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. KargolSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
  2. People v. ClarkSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. In re Muñoz FernósSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 2011
  2. In the Matter of New Era, Inc., Appeals of New Era, Inc. And Phoenix Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
  3. People v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1997
  4. People v. KolhouseSupreme Court of Colorado · 2013
  5. The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado v. Angelique LAYTON, 36480Supreme Court of Colorado · 2021

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API